-
Study: Free Trade Agreements Helped Bring $8.3 Billion to U.S. Dairy Over 10 Years
By USDEC January 26, 2016- Tweet
USDEC and NMPF estimate FTAs increased the average U.S. dairy farmer’s income $7,560 from 2004-2014.
Editor's Note: This is the first post of a two-part blog series explaining a joint report (PDF download) by USDEC and NMPF on the “Economic Impact of Trade Agreements Implemented Under Trade Authorities Procedures.” The next blog post in this series will examine, "Six Countries Where Free Trade Agreements Deliver Big Impact for U.S. Dairy Exports."
How important have free trade agreements been to the U.S. dairy industry?
An analysis by the U.S. Dairy Export Council and the National Milk Producers Federation shows FTAs helped bring an additional $8.3 billion to the industry from 2004-2014.
According to the study, additional exports of U.S. dairy products examined during that period resulted in:
- A $0.34 per hundredweight higher average milk price.
- An average of $756 in additional income each year for the American dairy farmer.
- An additional $7,560 for the American dairy farmer over the 10 years studied.
“Positive ROI is not the automatic result of every free trade agreement,” said USDEC President Tom Suber. “But this analysis shows that each individual agreement negotiated over the last 15 years has led to an increase in dairy exports. That’s why we focus so much energy on our trade agreements.”
USDEC members help fund trade policy efforts in Washington through their annual dues.
TPP still being examined, not part of this study
USDEC and NMPF are “still reserving judgment” as they carefully examine the full text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement released by the Obama administration, said Jaime Castaneda, senior vice president of trade policy at the U.S. Dairy Export Council.
Although the impact of the TPP agreement on the dairy industry’s outlook remains to be determined, past Free Trade Agreements have clearly been positive for the U.S. dairy industry, according to the analysis by USDEC and NMPF.
The 2004-2014 report was done in response to an International Trade Commission investigation seeking to assess the economic impact of Trade Agreements implemented under Trade Authority procedures.
Dairy markets are in a global downturn that may not, according to USDEC forecasts, fully end until 2017, causing considerable pain in the meantime. However, the report makes the case that Free Trade Agreements have over the long haul boosted U.S. dairy exports, which have, in turn, benefited U.S. farmers, processors and the U.S. economy as a whole.
Statistics showing the positive impact of U.S. dairy exports
Consider these data points:
- Our nation has gone from exporting dairy products valued at less than $1 billion in 2000 to exporting a record $7.1 billion in 2014, an increase of 625%. Click to tweet.
- Sixteen years ago we were exporting roughly 5% of our milk production, now we’re at three times that level, even as overall U.S. milk production has continued to grow. Click to tweet.
- The equivalent of one day’s milk production each week from the entire U.S. dairy industry ultimately ends up overseas, making exports integral to the health of the dairy industry at large. Click to tweet.
- USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) estimates that each billion dollars of U.S. dairy exports generates 20,093 jobs at the milk production level. Click to tweet.
- A dollar of U.S. dairy exports generates $2.76 of economic output. Click to tweet.
- For agriculture as a whole, each billion dollars in exports generates 5,780 jobs, an impressive number. But in the dairy sector, each billion dollars in exports generates over three times as many jobs. Click to tweet.
- The $7.1 billion that we exported in dairy products in 2014 supported more than 142,000 U.S. jobs at the production level. Click to tweet.
- According to ERS multipliers, those exports generated nearly $19.6 billion in additional economic activity at that level. Click to tweet.
- At the manufacturing level, where the milk is turned into cheese and other processed dairy products, ERS estimates that each billion dollars of exports generates 3,150 jobs. Click to tweet.
- Our exports in 2014 supported 22,300 jobs at the manufacturing level. Click to tweet.
- This, in turn, generated additional economic activity of nearly $25 billion. Click to tweet.
To best understand the level of importance that exports have today for the U.S. dairy industry and farmers in particular, a key barometer is the percentage of incremental milk solids going to support U.S. dairy exports. From 2003 through 2014, total U.S. milk production increased by nearly 35.7 billion pounds. Over that time, 61 percent of the increase in U.S. milk solids produced was required to supply U.S. dairy product exports.
Methodology: How the study came up with $8.3 billion impact
An important factor in that growth has been the expansion of free trade agreements.
The current study by USDEC and NMPF, which found that free trade agreements had an $8.3 billion impact from 2004 to 2014, “provides strong evidence of the progress and growth that can be achieved for the U.S. dairy industry with expanding trade agreements," said Shawna Morris, USDEC vice president, trade policy.
The $8.3 billion impact "was an estimate of the increased dairy farmer gross income due to the incremental expansion of demand that stemmed from all the free trade agreements," said NMPF economist Peter Vitaliano. "This estimate includes the effects of the additional sales from the expanded exports and the higher milk prices that resulted from the additional sales. We also took into account the somewhat offsetting additional milk production that resulted from the higher prices. which attenuated the price impact. That had a somewhat offsetting reduction in domestic demand that resulted from the higher prices.
The table below shows our dairy trade balance with key U.S. FTA partners over the past two decades, going beyond the previous 2014-2014 estimates. In each case, agreements have shown substantial, sometimes dramatic, increases.
U.S. Dairy Export Growth with FTA Partners Over Two Decades
Mobile phone users: Turn screen horizontal to view full chart.
U.S. dairy exports
(In millions of dollars)
FTA partner
Date entered into force
Year before agreement
2014 data
Growth (%)
Mexico -NAFTA
1994
250
1,644
+558
Canada -NAFTA
1994
58
592
+925
Jordan FTA
2001
2
7
+228
Singapore FTA
2004
8
100
+1,132
Chile FTA
2004
3
60
+2,225
Israel (ATAP)
2004
7
20
+193
Australia FTA
2005
6
173
+3,012
El Salvador (CAFTA)
2006
5
14
+184
Honduras (CAFTA)
2006
8
25
+232
Nicaragua (CAFTA)
2006
4
19
+373
Guatemala (CAFTA)
2006
30
40
+34
Morocco FTA
2006
0.1
97
+150,437
Bahrain FTA
2006
0.5
27
+5,011
Dominican Republic
2007
17
86
+399
Costa Rica (CAFTA)
2009
4
17
+294
Oman
2009
0.6
1.5
+152
Peru
2009
20
69
+243
South Korea
2012
223
416
+86
Colombia
2012
9
60
+601
Panama
2012
33
49
+49
Sources: USDA GATS, U.S. Census Bureau Trade Data.
Risks of negotiating FTAs
While FTAs have clearly been beneficial to U.S. dairy exports, it is important to point out that there are potential risks that need to be considered whenever negotiating a new trade agreement.
"What the industry needs are well-negotiated agreements," said Shawna Morris, USDEC vice president, trade policy.
If poorly negotiated, trade agreements can distort trading opportunities by failing to sufficiently remove barriers to U.S. exports, a risk that is heightened in the context of the potential to expand access to the U.S. market in a manner that is disproportionate to that granted to U.S. dairy exporters.
Given exports’ critical importance to the U.S. dairy industry and the dairy industry’s contribution to the U.S. agricultural and manufacturing economy, it is vital that U.S. negotiators prioritize the removal of tariff and nontariff barriers to U.S. dairy exports and tackle any expansions of U.S. dairy imports in a manner that is proportional to the export gains secured for our industry.
As USDEC and NMPF fully analyze the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement and continue to work on the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations, the report provides a benchmark on the success of past trade packages.
Risks of avoiding FTAs
While FTAs are difficult to negotiate and get approved by the U.S. Congress, there is potential downside to avoiding them.
“Without continued effort to expand our market access in new places, we run the risk of losing market share as our trading partners forge ahead with their own agreements that address their tariff and nontariff concerns while at the same time putting the U.S. at a disadvantage,” said Castaneda. “Continued cooperation between the industry and trade negotiators, helping to draft and negotiate agreements, will lead to better outcomes.”
While the future, as always, is not crystal clear, the report by USDEC and NMPF definitively shows that well-negotiated Free Trade Agreements can increase U.S. dairy competitiveness and increase sales in markets around the world.
Next in this series: "Six Countries Where Free Trade Agreements Deliver Big Impact for U.S. Dairy Exports."
Learn more about Free Trade Agreements for the U.S. dairy industry:
- Pros and Cons of TPP for U.S. Dairy Industry
- Statement from NMPF and USDEC on Release of Full Text of Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
- U.S. Dairy Industry Needs to See TPP Details
- 3 Ways U.S. Korea Trade Agreement Has Helped U.S. Dairy
- Trade Agreements Deliver for the U.S. Dairy Industry
To download a printable pdf version of the joint report by USDEC and NMPF on the impact of free trade agreements, click here.
Subscribe to the U.S. Dairy Exporter Blog
The U.S. Dairy Export Council fosters collaborative industry partnerships with processors, trading companies and others to enhance global demand for U.S. dairy products and ingredients. USDEC is primarily supported by Dairy Management Inc. through the dairy farmer checkoff. How to republish this post.
10 Most Recent Posts
Most Popular Posts in Past Year
Index of Posts by Topic
- #GotDairyJobs (4)
- About USDEC (65)
- Africa (6)
- Australia (4)
- Blog (8)
- Brazil (4)
- Canada (20)
- Central America (1)
- Cheese (58)
- Chile (1)
- China (54)
- Common food names (7)
- Company News (17)
- Consistent Supply (1)
- Crisis Management (3)
- Cuba (2)
- Dairy (6)
- Dairy checkoff (9)
- Dairy Ingredients (5)
- Dairy Management Inc. (2)
- Dairy Resources (1)
- Dairy Supply Chain (1)
- Dairy Trends (5)
- Documentation (3)
- EU (24)
- Experts on Dairy Exports (4)
- Exporter of the Year (2)
- Exports (24)
- Farmer leaders (1)
- Farming (38)
- Food Aid (8)
- Food Safety (8)
- Foodservice (3)
- Free trade agreements (34)
- Future trends (1)
- Geographical Indications (GIs) (10)
- Global Marketing (86)
- Global Shipping Crisis (1)
- Got Jobs? (9)
- Indonesia (1)
- Innovation (17)
- Japan (17)
- Krysta Harden (1)
- Market Access (25)
- Market Conditions (255)
- Member Services (17)
- Mexico (40)
- Middle East (9)
- Middle East & North Africa (3)
- Middle East/North Africa (9)
- Milk (4)
- Milk Protein Concentrate (MPC) (2)
- New Zealand (11)
- Next5% (20)
- Nonfat Dry Milk/Skim Milk Powder (8)
- Nutrition (18)
- Product Innovation (6)
- Protein (4)
- Regulations (5)
- Research & Data (313)
- Russia (3)
- Singapore (10)
- South America (8)
- South Korea (10)
- Southeast Asia (25)
- Strategic Insights (1)
- Supply (1)
- Sustainability (25)
- Technology (2)
- ThinkUSADairy (5)
- TPM23 (1)
- TPP (13)
- Traceability (8)
- Trade Barriers (5)
- Trade Data (7)
- Trade Policy (72)
- TTIP (5)
- UHT Milk (7)
- USMCA (2)
- Vietnam (4)
- Whey (6)
- Whey Ingredients (2)
- Whey products (10)
- Whole Milk Powder (WMP) (3)
- World Dairy Expo (1)
- World Milk Day (1)
- Yogurt (1)
Index of Posts by Date, Author
- June 2021 (13)
- March 2015 (12)
- September 2015 (12)
- April 2015 (11)
- December 2015 (11)
- March 2014 (10)
- February 2015 (10)
- October 2015 (10)
- October 2014 (9)
- June 2015 (9)
- July 2015 (9)
- November 2015 (9)
- March 2016 (9)
- October 2019 (9)
- September 2013 (8)
- May 2015 (8)
- August 2015 (8)
- January 2016 (8)
- February 2016 (8)
- March 2017 (8)
- December 2018 (8)
- May 2019 (8)
- December 2019 (8)
- June 2014 (7)
- November 2016 (7)
- May 2017 (7)
- May 2018 (7)
- July 2020 (7)
- June 2023 (7)
- July 2016 (6)
- August 2018 (6)
- October 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (6)
- February 2019 (6)
- June 2019 (6)
- August 2019 (6)
- March 2020 (6)
- April 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (6)
- June 2022 (6)
- February 2014 (5)
- June 2016 (5)
- August 2016 (5)
- September 2016 (5)
- December 2016 (5)
- February 2017 (5)
- July 2017 (5)
- October 2017 (5)
- January 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (5)
- June 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (5)
- September 2018 (5)
- January 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (5)
- April 2019 (5)
- July 2019 (5)
- September 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (5)
- January 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (5)
- April 2021 (5)
- January 2022 (5)
- May 2013 (4)
- September 2014 (4)
- April 2016 (4)
- May 2016 (4)
- October 2016 (4)
- January 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (4)
- December 2017 (4)
- February 2018 (4)
- February 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- February 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (4)
- April 2023 (4)
- December 2023 (4)
- November 2017 (3)
- March 2018 (3)
- September 2020 (3)
- December 2020 (3)
- February 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (3)
- December 2021 (3)
- March 2022 (3)
- April 2022 (3)
- May 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (3)
- December 2022 (3)
- May 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (3)
- March 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (2)
- March 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (2)
- March 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (2)
- November 2020 (2)
- January 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (2)
- November 2021 (2)
- July 2022 (2)
- August 2022 (2)
- January 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (2)
- January 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (2)
- June 2024 (2)
- July 2024 (2)
- November 2024 (2)
- January 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- June 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (1)
- November 2010 (1)
- December 2010 (1)
- January 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- December 2011 (1)
- January 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (1)
- April 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- December 2012 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- February 2013 (1)
- April 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (1)
- August 2013 (1)
- October 2013 (1)
- November 2013 (1)
- December 2013 (1)
- January 2014 (1)
- April 2014 (1)
- May 2014 (1)
- November 2022 (1)
- February 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- March 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- August 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- USDEC (183)
- USDEC Staff (147)
- Alan Levitt (119)
- Tom Suber (41)
- Margaret Speich (22)
- Marc A.H. Beck (15)
- Vikki Nicholson-West (11)
- Angélique Hollister (11)
- Tom Vilsack (8)
- Jaime Castaneda (7)
- Matt McKnight (7)
- Véronique Lagrange (7)
- Margaret Speich and Mark O'Keefe (7)
- Ross Christieson (7)
- Paul Rogers (6)
- Shawna Morris (5)
- William Loux (5)
- Alan Levitt and Marc Beck (5)
- Krysta Harden (4)
- USDEC Communications (3)
- Kristi Saitama (3)
- Marilyn Hershey (3)
- Brad Gehrke (3)
- Tom Quaife (2)
- Jim Mulhern (2)
- Alan Levitt and William Loux (2)
- Kara McDonald (2)
- Luke Waring (2)
- Merle McNeil (2)
- Andrei Mikhalevsky (1)
- Rodrigo Fernandez (1)
- Nick Gardner (1)
- Dermot Carey (1)
- Jeremy Travis (1)
- Annie Bienvenue (1)
- Ross Christieson and Shawna Morris (1)
- Paul Rogers and Tom Quaife (1)
- Rick Ortman (1)
- Tony Rice (1)
- Barbara O’Brien (1)
- Paul Rogers and Mark O'Keefe (1)
- Dalilah Ghazalay (1)
- Amy Wagner (1)
- Mitchell Bowling (1)
- Erica Louder (1)
- Brad Scott (1)
- Amy Foor (1)
- Scott Lantz (1)
- Sandra Benson (1)
- Errico Auricchio (1)
- Jaclyn Krymowski (1)
- Krysta Harden, USDEC President and CEO (1)